The first thing you need to understand about alchemy, just
to clarify, before we go any further, is that alchemy in it’s classic sense is
at best a pseudoscience. As entertaining as the idea of turning common metals
into gold is, the field eventually evolved into chemistry with the help of
Antoine Lavoisier (and many others) in the 18th century. That’s not
to say that the endeavors of alchemy were all for naught.
There is a
process, called Nuclear Transmutation, in which atoms of one element can be
changed into that of another by ‘transmutation’. This can occur in a nuclear
reaction or through radioactive decay. Both of these reactions can happen in
the natural and experimental world, but more on that later.
The term
transmutation dates back to the philosopher’s stone (which turns base metals
into gold), but by 1720, not a single respectable figure pursued classical
alchemy. Nuclear Transmutation was first applied to modern science when Ernest
Rutherford and Frederick Soddy observed that radioactive Thorium decayed into
Radium in 1901. As the story goes, Soddy jumped up screaming: "Rutherford , this is transmutation!" And Rutherford snapped back, "For Christ's sake, Soddy,
don't call it transmutation!
They'll have our heads off as alchemists."
Years later, in 1932, the first
fully artificial nuclear reaction was achieved by Rutherford ’s
colleagues John Cockcroft and Ernest Walton by using accelerated protons to
split lithium. This was called “splitting the atom”, the modern term “Nuclear
Fission” came along some time later.
It was transpired that under the
principles of Nuclear Transmutation, it would be far easier to turn gold into
lead than the converse. Experimentation has successfully achieved alchemists’
and King Midas’ dreams (some say as early as 1951), and found a reaction that
yields gold, but the expense far outweighs any gain to be had.
No comments:
Post a Comment